I have been thinking for a while that the aims of Pagan traditions with regard to the self, soul, spirit, consciousness and its relationship with the Universe are different from that of other religions.
The cultivation of virtue
One of the aims in several Pagan traditions is the cultivation of virtue. In Heathenry, there are the Nine Noble Virtues; in Wicca, there are the Eight Wiccan Virtues; many adherents of Religio Romana try to cultivate the virtues which the Romans of antiquity valued. The cultivation of virtue assumes that the virtues will grow in fertile soil – the soul in which they grow is not choked by weeds, although a certain amount of weeding might be required to help the virtues to grow.
In Christian mysticism, by contrast, in order for the divine image to grow in the soul, there must first be kenosis – a process of self-emptying. One is then filled with divinity (divinisation in Western Christianity; theosis in Eastern Orthodoxy), and one’s divine image is restored (previously it had been bleared by sin).
In Wicca, there are three levels of initiation, and each involves an encounter with a different aspect of divinity – but there is no self-emptying. There is a stage where everything changes and is called into question, but that is the nature of such a journey, and is found in most traditions.
The kinds of virtue that are being cultivated are also slightly different. Whilst compassion is a virtue, it is wise compassion rather than indiscriminating compassion (this distinction is very important in Buddhism, where I first came across the idea). Other Pagan virtues include strength, mirth, honour (three of the Wiccan virtues) and courage, honour, self-reliance (three of the Heathen virtues).
Seeking the authentic self
Sarah Pike, in her anthropological investigations of Pagan festivals (documented in Earthly Bodies, Magical Selves: Contemporary Pagans and the Search for Community), found that the goal of the Pagan quest is to find the “authentic self” or the “true self”. This suggests that we are uncovering a pre-existing treasure, rather than erasing what exists and starting again.
The authentic self may turn out not to be “nice”. The Romantic poets were true individuals who produced great poetry; but they were not necessarily nice people (thanks to my friend CA for this example).
Most Pagans view the divine and/or deities as immanent in the world (or as immediate). Therefore the world is not fallen, and a multiplicity of forces – creation and destruction, yin and yang, growth and decay, energy and entropy, are in dynamic balance within it. These forces are also at play in microcosm in the human psyche, and that is entirely natural. Being angry, or sad, and acting on those emotions (in a controlled way), is not wrong – activism comes from anger, creativity can come from sadness.
The shadow and the psyche
A person with their shadow well-integrated can use its energy to provide them with power and decisiveness. A person with a well-integrated shadow knows how to say no, how to offer constructive criticism, how to avoid foolish compassion, and how to accept, welcome, and use the “dark side” of their personality (including anger, assertiveness, power, etc). They are also more interesting to know.
A person with no shadow (or no conscious access to their shadow) appears to be all sweetness and light on the surface, and presents as either generous, receptive, or passive, but when they eventually lash out, they do so from an ungrounded place, and are unable to connect their anger with the emotions that would balance it. Often, such people are “touchy-feely” and not analytical.
I have met a lot of “spiritual” people who are just too nice, and it seems false; they even talk in a high-pitched voice that sounds fake. There’s a great Monty Python cartoon where there’s a ‘nice’ vicar type with a soapy smile, but his smile keeps unzipping and letting monsters out of his head, so he has to keep nailing the top of his head back on. In other words, the more someone suppresses their “dark” side (shadow) and fails to integrate it, the more likely it is to lead to an explosion and an eruption of the shadow aspects (“monsters from the Id”).
Jung said that the work of individuation is all about integrating the energy from the Shadow and being able to use it creatively and constructively. As we bring the obscure unconscious material into the light of consciousness, it is transformed.
The psyche and the world
In Pagan communities, people do not attempt to shape others into any particular mould – there is no template for how the authentic self should look, because it is unique to each person.
Heelas and Woodhead, in The spiritual revolution (2006), talk about religions of humanity, that attempt to mould their adherents to a particular way of being and a set pattern of virtues. Most Pagan traditions refrain from doing this, and instead encourage individuality and a quest for the true self.
The relationship of the individual with the Pagan community tends to be more network-based. We meet in pubs for Pagan moots and gatherings, and the actual spiritual work happens in small groups such as covens, groves, hearths. People come together for large festivals, but there the quest is for freedom to be one’s true self.
Spirit and matter
In many spiritual traditions, especially those descended from Gnosticism, the aim is to leave the body and return to the divine source. (The radical rejection of matter may have been one of the reasons why orthodox Christians persecuted the Gnostics, apparently.)
In Pagan traditions, I would argue, because we love the land, or the Earth, or Nature (depending on the tradition), the aim is to awaken the soul of Nature, and to commune with the spirits of place (land wights, genii loci, and so on); therefore we want to bring more spirit into matter, not to separate the two.
Some people interpret “spirituality” to mean “the things of the spirit world”. Personally, I have always interpreted it as “a response of awe, wonder, and gratitude for the beauty of Nature, art, literature, scientific insight, and poetry” but increasingly it is being used as a term that means something to do with the non-material. It has also been described, by L Bregman, as “a glowing and useful term in search of a meaning”.
So I am starting to prefer the word “embodiment”, which is all about being in touch with your body, and not alienated from it. I am still (slowly) learning about embodiment practices. However, I think embodiment is probably a more Pagan concept than spirituality.
Given that Pagan traditions generally seek to cultivate the authentic self, and to put us in touch with the physical world, the wider community of other-than-human people (animals, plants, and spirits of place), and given that Pagans generally regard the divine and/or deities as immanent in Nature, we should be wary of importing spiritual practices, norms, and goals from other traditions without first checking how they fit with our existing goals, norms, and practices.
If you enjoyed this post, you might like my books.
6 thoughts on “Individuation in Pagan traditions”
Embodiment rather than spirituality has a grounding appeal. I definitely agree with your caution on importing or appropriating from other traditions. I’m not sure about the pagan goal being one for the “authentic self.” That part has a more New Age ring to it. Do pagans truly question the self and not simply accept the self as one’s personal vehicle through which to honour nature, serve others and the needy, celebrate life and cultivate the virtues? That focus on the self/Self (Paul Heelas’ Self Religions) seems to me less pagan which instead is more a focus on nature, the earth, the gods, etc. rather than navel gazing or radical egoic introspection.
Very good point Michael.
I wonder who the groups were that Sarah Pike was studying in Earthly bodies, magical selves? Were they more New Agey or more Pagany? (I really should read that book.)
Personally, I want to not hurt anyone if I can help it, but that includes me, so I am not into beating myself up for not being nice enough.
I want to integrate the shadow with my conscious self as part of the process of individuation but then my Pagan practice is quite influenced by Jung.
And I would rather be my true, individual self than a person moulded by a religion of humanity, or swayed hither and thither by the currents of fashion.
Like Michael I like a lot of what you say here, particularly about importing and appropriating. A search for a pre-existing ‘authentic self’ doesn’t work for me – I would say I am bit of a postmodernist pagan and think I am producing my ‘self’ by the searches I undertake. I suppose what I am seeking is the experinence of enchantment and the experience of mystery – but I don’t seek these too hard because if you stare at them I feel you can’t see them, rather they creep up on you from the side. So maybe I am not seeking at all but putting myself in the way of enchantment and mystery. That is in fact the main philosophy behind the group I work with and is reflected in our name. Rather than virtue I think I am hoping for a better relationship with the earth and through that to feel my place in the universe. I am not very good at theorising paganism for anyone but myself!
I could never get my head round the postmodernist notion of the absence of self, but I am pretty postmodernist myself.
I guess I see being true to myself as a process of relating to an evolving and changing self. But I keep finding that as I change, I keep coming back to some core ideas that I had when I started out.
I like your thing of putting yourself in the way of enchantment and mystery. Lovely way of putting it. And the idea of creeping up on you from the side is rather similar to the Buddhist idea that enlightenment is only a heartbeat away.
I think Pagan notions of virtue is much broader and earthier than the Christian one. Pagan virtues include honour, pride, courage, strength, etc.
I think as a general rule the only traditions we need to be careful about are the ones that are explicitly dedicated to our eradication. But that’s just common sense, or at least it should be.
In fact, part of the natural tendency in many historical Pagan traditions is to rather freely sample from and experiment with different traditions. Such syncretism was extremely common and is very well documented throughout the ancient Mediterranean world in particular, where trade, migration and colonization over thousands of years led to lots of contact and intermingling of peoples from different cultures, and usually wherever one finds lots of cross-cultural contacts, one will find lots of mixing and matching in the realm of religion. This tendency is very pronounced in modern Paganism and in and of itself there is nothing at all wrong with it.
I was thinking of borrowings from non-Pagan traditions, rather than borrowings from other Pagan traditions. And whilst we can borrow from non-Pagan traditions, extra caution should be applied, imho.
Comments are closed.