Que leur souvenir demeure

I’ve been reflecting a lot about the events of 6 December 1989 in Montreal. Many of the victims of the Ecole Polytechnique shooting were born around the same time as me, but their lives were abruptly cut short by a man with a grudge against feminists (or his distorted idea of what a feminist is) and a history of domestic violence (frequently the case with the perpetrators of mass shootings). The 14 women were engineering students, or worked in the school of engineering. I am a woman and a feminist and I work in IT, part of the STEM field. That could’ve been me. So this feels personal in the same way that the Pulse nightclub shooting felt personal because I am bisexual and genderqueer, and the victims were LGBTQIA.

Anne-Marie Lemay🕯

Maryse Leclair 🕯

Anne-Marie Edward🕯

Annie St-Arneault🕯

Annie Turcotte🕯

Barbara Daigneault🕯

Barbara Klucznik-Widajewicz 🕯

Geneviève Bergeron🕯

Hélène Colgan🕯

Maryse Laganière 🕯

Maud Haviernick 🕯

Michele Richard 🕯

Nathalie Croteau 🕯

Sonia Pelletier 🕯

If you check out the hashtag PolySeSouvient (remember the Polytechnique) on Twitter or Instagram, the posts are divided between gun owners saying that gun laws in Canada shouldn’t be more restrictive, men saying they refuse to take responsibility for the toxic masculinity of the shooter, and people actually posting in memory of the 14 victims. I’m disgusted that the first two categories are spamming a hashtag for remembering the victims, but I think it’s worth pushing back on the points they’re trying to make.

Gun Control

First, gun control. It’s very simple. Countries that have less guns also have less deaths from shootings, including suicide, accidental shootings, single murder by shooting, or mass shootings.

The USA has 120 guns for every 100 people. Canada has 35 guns for every 100 people. England and Wales have 5 guns for every 100 people. (Source: Estimated number of civilian guns per capita by country).

Comparative data for gun deaths around the world seems to only be available up to 2016.

The lowest rates of gun deaths were in countries with the least gun ownership.

In 2018, Canada had 249 gun deaths. Compared to the USA, that’s low, but compared to other countries with a similar economic status, it’s high.

Japan, which has strict laws controlling firearms (and no handguns), rarely has more than 10 shooting deaths a year out of a population of 127 million people. (Source: The Independent).

And as Pam Palmater pointed out, guns and white supremacists are a lethal combination. And white supremacism is on the rise in majority-white countries.

Then there’s the people who complain about mass shootings being “politicized” by people calling for gun control. When the link between high levels of gun ownership and the number of gun deaths is so obvious, talking about gun control just after a mass shooting seems like a reasonable idea to me.

Toxic masculinity

The concept behind the phrase “toxic masculinity” is that there is a discourse among certain groups of men that enables and promotes violence against women and people of colour. It’s not saying that all men harbour a secret hatred of women.

However, we live in a culture that makes films about men who have to get revenge through violent means, usually murder. A culture that teaches young men that they are entitled to sexual intercourse (and that “nice girls” don’t really like it, so we have to be cajoled with flowers and gifts and dinners – and after providing enough of these enticements, the man is automatically entitled to sex). A culture that teaches men not to cry or show their feelings. That teaches girls that little boys who hit them actually like them (what?!?) A culture that still harbours toxic views towards LGBTQ2SIA people, feminists, Indigenous Peoples, Black people, people of colour, and disabled people. Would you trust a culture in which these kinds of views are on the rise with guns?

A high percentage of perpetrators of mass killings either had a history of domestic violence and abuse, or harboured extreme racist and misogynistic views. There’s clearly a link between the increasing visibility and acceptance of extremism, and the frequency of mass killings.

Men who commit rape, sexual abuse, and violence often feel enabled by the apparent acquiescence towards (which they take for agreement with) their views by the men around them. So if you hear someone expressing extremist or bigoted views, try to challenge what they’re saying.

It’s very clear that the 1989 Ecole Polytechnique shooting was an attack on women and particularly feminists. And other would-be mass shooters read the accounts and manifestos of previous shooters, and repeat the same ideas. So as a global society, we need to be vigilant about the places where these ideas are spread and perpetuated.

May the memory and the names of the 14 women killed that night never be forgotten.

A woman lays roses at the memorial for the 14 women killed in 1989Que leur souvenir demeure

2 thoughts on “Que leur souvenir demeure

  1. An important post. I remain as shocked and saddened by these shootings in Canada in 1989 as I am by the more recent Manchester attack at Ariana Grande’s concert, which again targeted women and girls. I am glad to say that I don’t know a single man who would in any way condone or endorse either of these terrible events. However, I recognise that, sadly, out in the wider world, some would. You are absolutely right about gun control. The fewer guns, the better.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s